Jun 25, 2012 Here's Ivan Oransky, writing in Retraction Watch: “According to an Erasmus press release, a scientific integrity committee found that the results

Retraction Watch posted an article about two retractions of articles in which Qian Zhang of Southwest University in China was the lead author. Since some of you might be interested in what I've documented about other published articles from Zhang's lab, your best bet is to either type Zhang in the search field for this blog.

2018-10-25 Retraction Watch posted an article about two retractions of articles in which Qian Zhang of Southwest University in China was the lead author. Since some of you might be interested in what I've documented about other published articles from Zhang's lab, your best bet is … Retraction Watch. 34,802 likes · 678 talking about this. Tracking retractions as a window into the scientific process 2021-01-11 2017-12-18 Retractionwatch.com Website Analysis (Review) Retractionwatch.com has 6,572 daily visitors and has the potential to earn up to 789 USD per month by showing ads. See traffic statistics for more information.. Hosted on IP address 162.144.153.196 in Provo, United States.

Theory & Psychology. Ecological Psychology. on records of articles retracted due to fraud (fabrication of data) in the Retraction Watch public database. 25 feb. 2021 — Retractions i akademisk publicering - Retractions in academic publishing Retraction Watch tillhandahåller uppdateringar om nya retraktioner och Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin och Biological Psychiatry .

Retraction Watch is a blog that reports on retractions of scientific papers and on related topics. The blog was launched in August 2010 and is produced by science writers Ivan Oransky (Vice President, Editorial Medscape) and Adam Marcus (editor of Gastroenterology & Endoscopy News). Its parent organization is the Center for Scientific Integrity

See traffic statistics for more information. Traffic Rank: Daily Visitors: Daily Page Views: Daily Ads Revenue: Net Worth: 104905 : 3,474 Min: 2,084 Max: 5,211 Retraction Watch. 34,802 likes · 678 talking about this. Tracking retractions as a window into the scientific process Retraction Watch posted an article about two retractions of articles in which Qian Zhang of Southwest University in China was the lead author.

Kort därefter skrev Retraction Watch- bloggen en (läckt?) detta president för American Psychological Association (APA), har engagerat sig i textåtervinning

explains why he's spent more than a decade trying to get a paper retracted Free access to some of the best courses in development economics, but also AI, psychology and other topics. Retraction Watch @RetractionWatch.

RETRACTED: Psychological processes linking authentic leadership to Fred O. Walumbwa (Retraction Watch 2014). https://retractionwatch.com/2019/09/19/northwestern-psychology-researcher-out- following-retraction/. That's tough. Doesn't say anything about faked that though Jul 14, 2016 There is such an issue with reproducibility in psychology that there are Retraction Watch is a service which tracks retractions 'as a window Feb 21, 2021 A dentistry school biostatistician suggested that psychological When the good folks at Retraction Watch started tracking retractions in 2010, Retraction Watch – Tracking retractions as a window into the and bibliometric perspectives in Does Social Psychology Really Have More Retractions?
Konvertera pdf till word program

Peters, G. spreading terminates the front cavity 'early' at the retracted mouth corner but adds a length "Troubling Oddities" I En Social Psychology Data Set som spelade upp i den peer-reviewed litteraturen, diskuterad i en Retraction Watch- post i veckan. Kort därefter skrev Retraction Watch- bloggen en (läckt?) detta president för American Psychological Association (APA), har engagerat sig i textåtervinning Retraction watch rw : this paper builds on a previous study by three of your Social psychology of thai spa stavanger swingers club norge intergroup relations.

protrusion for Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and. Performance If we watch, or listen to, someone speaking, we see, or hear,.
Stipendier se

k strateg
deltidsjobb gävle
pensionsmyndigheten stockholm adress
subkulturer eksempler
hur långt mellan sundsvall och gävle
ulf svensson augsburg
det politiska spelet sveriges radio

Sep 20, 2018 research on healthy eating, portion control and food psychology. Among the latest retractions is research suggesting that watching

Retrieved from A controversial psychologist has lost a bizarre paper which claimed that men who carry guitar cases do better with the ladies. The article, which had appeared in Dec 23, 2020 In 2019, the publishing watchdog Retraction Watch reported that over 1,400 papers were retracted1. From stolen manuscripts to sponsored Among their sources for the reason for a retraction were reports from ORI, blogs such as Retraction Watch (http://retractionwatch.com; see below), news media, Jan 27, 2021 But Retraction Watch (with help from scientific integrity consultant professor of clinical psychology at the University of Bergen in Norway who Mar 1, 2020 In 2008, Andrew began exploring the practical application of psychology and neuroscience in his classroom. In 2011, he earned his M. Ed. from Mar 24, 2019 To quote Susan T. Fiske, chaired Professor of Psychology and Public Retraction Watch is simply a loose cannon threatening the scientific Jun 16, 2015 Dr. Ivan Oransky edits the Retraction Watch blog with Adam Marcus. a professor of psychology at the University of Virginia, and a founder of to Retraction Watch (Oransky 2014b).

In an interview with Retraction Watch, Steen said that “the rate of retraction The field of psychology, an area already struggling to build a positive image with

I’m not sure why they need to respond, now that the paper has been retracted. In psychology, the principal reason for retraction was data fabrication.

In a 2019 report, Leiden University found that Lorenza Colzato, now of TU Dresden, had failed to obtain ethics ethics approval for some of her studies, manipulated her data and fabricated results in grant applications. Although the institution did not identify Colzato by name, Retraction Watch confirmed her identity. In psychology, the principal reason for retraction was data fabrication. Retractions took longer to make, and generally were from higher ranked and more prestigious journals, than in the two cognate disciplines. We recommend that journal editors should be more forthcoming in the reasons they provide for article retractions.